Cyber Resilience Act | Building Strength or Revealing Weakness?
- antoinetteh29
- Jan 15
- 5 min read
Updated: Feb 26
Adopted by the European Union on October 10, 2024, the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) is set to be enforced starting October 2027, signifying a crucial advancement in the security of digital products and IoT. Much like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) revolutionized data privacy, the CRA is expected to greatly impact the design, development and delivery of digital products and services. This regulation presents both a challenge and an opportunity to incorporate resilience and security into their organizational structures while ensuring compliance.

A Unified Vision for a Secure Digital Ecosystem
The CRA addresses the urgent need to correct systemic shortcomings in cybersecurity. Historically, manufacturers have often prioritized cost and rapid time-to-market over robust security measures, leaving internet-connected devices exposed to growing cyber threats. This vulnerability escalates risks for individuals, businesses, and even critical infrastructure, creating a ripple effect of potential cyber incidents.
In response, governments are stepping in to enforce accountability throughout the entire supply chain, making security a foundational element rather than an afterthought. The EU is taking the lead by championing cybersecurity-by-design principles, promoting transparency, and setting a harmonized regulatory standard. This initiative underscores Europe's leadership in fostering a resilient and secure digital future, ensuring that security becomes a cornerstone of innovation and development.
A Regulatory Game-Changer Comparable to GDPR
The Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) addresses persistent challenges in the cybersecurity ecosystem, particularly in the fast-paced and competitive IoT market. Manufacturers often prioritize speed to market, innovative features, and cost reduction to maintain a competitive edge. However, this race for efficiency frequently comes at the expense of robust security, leaving connected devices vulnerable to significant cyber threats. The situation is further exacerbated by the complexity of implementing strong cybersecurity measures, inconsistent industry standards, and a general lack of consumer awareness about cybersecurity risks. These factors highlight an urgent need for regulatory intervention to create a safer digital landscape.
Similar to how the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) redefined global standards for data privacy, the CRA aims to set a worldwide precedent for cybersecurity requirements across manufacturers of digital products. Covering all internet-connected devices, software, hardware, and their supply chains, the CRA extends its impact well beyond EU borders, affecting any organization wishing to operate in the EU.
The CRA's influence is expected to rival that of GDPR, introducing sweeping implications such as increased compliance costs, faster innovation cycles, and transformative effects on global markets. This regulatory initiative serves as a critical step toward harmonized cybersecurity standards, fostering trust and resilience in the digital age.
Key Similarities Between CRA and GDPR
Global Applicability: Although focused on the EU, both the CRA and GDPR extend their reach to non-EU organizations that interact with EU consumers or businesses, requiring global compliance.
Severe Penalties: Non-compliance with the CRA can result in fines of up to €15 million or 2.5% of global annual turnover, paralleling the financial implications imposed by GDPR.
Organizational Transformation: Compliance with the CRA demands significant adjustments to product design, internal workflows, and supply chain operations, mirroring the extensive operational changes driven by GDPR.
Cultural Shift: Much like GDPR emphasized privacy by design, the CRA promotes a mindset focused on security by design and accountability throughout the entire product lifecycle.
Unpacking the Scope of the CRA
The Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) establishes mandatory cybersecurity standards for all digital products sold in the EU. These products are categorized into two risk levels—Class I and Class II—with heightened requirements for critical systems and networks. While open-source software is largely exempt, exceptions apply when it is included in commercial products.
Key objectives of the CRA include:
Minimizing Security Risks: Enforcing lifecycle security measures and ensuring comprehensive oversight throughout the supply chain.
Establishing Accountability: Holding organizations responsible for addressing vulnerabilities, even after the product has been sold.
Enhancing Transparency: Requiring clear communication of security features and potential risks, encompassing all components of the supply chain.
Standardizing Cybersecurity Practices: Creating a consistent framework of cybersecurity standards across the EU market.
Enforcing Compliance: Imposing significant penalties for violations to ensure rigorous adherence to regulations.
The Transformative Impact of the CRA
Much like GDPR, the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) is set to be a disruptive force across industries, introducing significant challenges as well as opportunities for innovation and growth.
Financial Strain: Compliance with the CRA will demand substantial investment in updated processes and frameworks. For instance, IoT manufacturers may need to upgrade or redesign product lines to align with the CRA’s stringent security requirements, likely increasing production costs.
Global Ripple Effects: Similar to GDPR’s impact on global data privacy norms, the CRA is expected to influence organizations outside the EU to adopt its principles, reshaping cybersecurity practices worldwide.
Catalyst for Innovation: The push to comply with CRA standards will encourage companies to develop more secure and resilient products, positioning security as a competitive differentiator.
Evolving Supply Chains: Businesses will need to strengthen supply chain oversight, introducing stricter controls and relying more on independent third-party assessments, which may alter traditional vendor relationships.
Boosted Consumer Confidence: By fostering transparency and enforcing robust security standards, the CRA has the potential to elevate consumer trust in secure digital products, akin to GDPR’s effect on data protection practices.
Unintended Consequences of the CRA
While the CRA’s goals are well-intentioned, its implementation may introduce several unexpected challenges:
Rise of Shadow IT: Users may gravitate toward less expensive, non-compliant products, leading to the proliferation of unauthorized and insecure devices within enterprise networks.
Impact on "Grey" Imports: Non-compliant products from outside the EU will face heightened regulatory scrutiny, potentially reducing technological choices and driving up costs for consumers and businesses.
Legacy System Challenges: Organizations will confront tough decisions regarding older devices—either incurring high costs to retrofit legacy systems for CRA compliance or opting for full replacement, which may strain budgets.
Strategic actions
To excel within the CRA’s regulatory framework, organizations should embrace proactive measures now, using this preparatory period to establish a strong compliance foundation:
Conduct Thorough Audits: Begin with a comprehensive review of products, internal processes, and supply chains to pinpoint areas that need alignment with CRA requirements.
Collaborate with Supply Chain Partners: Engage third-party vendors early to assess their compliance strategies, incorporate CRA requirements into contracts, and conduct regular security evaluations.
Leverage Harmonized Standards: Align organizational practices with EU-endorsed cybersecurity benchmarks to streamline the compliance process and achieve certifications efficiently.
Lessons from GDPR: Turning Compliance Into Opportunity
Cost Savings Through Early Action: Companies that embraced GDPR compliance early experienced reduced penalties and smoother integration. Similarly, starting CRA compliance efforts now will mitigate future costs and risks.
Enhanced Reputation and Trust: Demonstrating compliance signals reliability, strengthening trust among consumers and stakeholders.
Driving Innovation: Use the transition to meet CRA standards as an opportunity to enhance product security and differentiation, positioning security as a valuable feature.

Conclusion
The CRA impacts the entire value chain—from manufacturers to service providers and end-users—highlighting the need for better communication about the importance of cybersecurity. While the manufacturing sector reports challenges in convincing customers to invest in security, customers note that suppliers often position security as a marketing tool rather than a necessity. This disconnect underscores the need to make security’s value more tangible.
As the next regulatory milestone, the CRA is set to redefine the landscape of secure digital products, much like GDPR transformed data privacy. For CISOs, compliance is not just a legal requirement but a strategic opportunity to strengthen cybersecurity defenses, foster innovation, and gain a competitive edge in global markets. Acting early will allow organizations to navigate complexities effectively, reduce risks, and establish themselves as leaders in building a resilient digital ecosystem.
Comments